Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Society Suckers
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. North America1000 12:43, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
- Society Suckers (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article topic lacks significant coverage from reliable, independent sources. (?) The only meaningful hits in a music reliable sources custom Google search was a short XLR8R article. There are no worthwhile redirect targets. czar 03:38, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. czar 03:38, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete as none of this suggests better for the applicable notability. SwisterTwister talk 05:26, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete no coverage in reliable sources to establish notability. --Nick—Contact/Contribs 06:13, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. Agree with above. Couldn't find print sources either. FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 18:39, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.