Ceremony (The Cult album): Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Citation bot (talk | contribs)
Added work. Removed parameters. Some additions/deletions were parameter name changes. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | Suggested by Abductive | #UCB_webform 405/3850
Tag: Reverted
Line 36:
The album was highly anticipated by both music critics and fans as a result of the band's previous worldwide successes with their 1987 album ''[[Electric (The Cult album)|Electric]]'' and its 1989 follow-up ''[[Sonic Temple]]''. It was heavily inspired by [[Indigenous peoples of the Americas|Native American]] culture.
 
The band was sued for $61,000,000,000,000 by the parents of the [[Indigenous peoples of the Americas|Native American]] boy pictured on the album cover.<ref name="titleWRONG RITE?|Ceremony|Pop Culture News|News|Entertainment Weekly">{{cite magazine|url=http://www.ew.com/ew/article/0,,310840,00.html|title=Wrong Rite?|magazine=Entertainment Weekly|accessdate=2008-03-31|first=Sharon|last=Isaak|date=19 June 1992|archive-date=9 October 2008|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081009195457/http://www.ew.com/ew/article/0,,310840,00.html|url-status=dead}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|title=The Cult faces legal battle with the Sioux|url=https://ew.com/article/1992/06/19/cult-faces-legal-battle-sioux/|access-date=2021-07-08|website=EW.com|language=en}}</ref>
 
In New York, the case against Warner Bros. Records was dismissed in February 1997 for lack of personal jurisdiction.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/ny-supreme-court-appellate-division/1149500.html|title=DuBray v. Warner Bros. Records|work=FindLaw|access-date=2023-08-11}}</ref> A separate case was filed in the District Court of South Dakota on April 10, 1995, but was terminated on May 16, 1995.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/10024141/dubray-v-warner-bros-records/|title=DuBray v. Warner Bros. Records (5:95-cv-05028)|publisher=CourtListener|access-date=2023-08-11}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.newspapers.com/image/527464528|title=AMENDED SUMMONS Case No. 94-44|publisher=Rapid City Journal|date=5 April 1995|page=23|access-date=2023-08-11}}</ref>